Foreword of The Greatest Creator

Xuefeng

What was the past for human being? What will be the limit point for mankind in the future?

Will the intelligence of human be able to stop the asteroids鈥 impact on earth?

If these questions cannot be answered, then we should turn ourselves to the Greatest Creator!

Chapter 25 of Tao Te Ching begins with 鈥淭here was something formless yet complete. It existed before heaven and earth鈥.

The Bible makes its purpose clear from the very beginning, 鈥淚n the beginning The God created the heaven and the earth鈥. (Here God means 鈥渢he Greatest Creator鈥

The Diamond Sutra says, 鈥淚f one desires to see me via colors and seek me through sound, he is pursuing an evil course and cannot acquire enlightenment from Buddha (the Greatest Creator)鈥.

Book of Odes-Decade of Wenwang- Great Brightness says, 鈥淭his king Wen,

Watchfully and reverently,

With entire intelligence served the Greatest Creator,

And so secured the great blessing.鈥

In chapter 8 鈥淭he Origin and Fate of the Universe鈥 of his book A Brief History of Time, the great scientist Stephen Hawking says, 鈥"The general theory of relativity, on its own, cannot explain these features or answer these questions because of its prediction that the universe started off with infinite density at the big bang singularity. At the singularity, general relativity and all other physical laws would break down"

"Science seems to have uncovered a set of laws that, within the limits set by the uncertainty principle, tell us how the universe will develop with time, if we know its state at any one time. These laws may have originally been decreed by God"锛圢ote: God is the same as the Greatest Creator锛

"One possible answer is to say that the Greatest Creator chose the initial configuration of the universe for reasons that we cannot hope to understand. This would certainly have been within the power of an omnipotent being"

"It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of the Greatest Creator who intended to create beings like us."

Man has six sensory organs of eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and consciousness, which correspond to six perceptions of vision, hearing, olfaction, taste, touch, and telegnosis. Man communes with the material world and the nonmaterial world via these six perceptions.

If a person is blind and has no vision, then how can we convince him that there is light in the universe? How can we prove the existence of light?

No, we cannot. For one is unable to perceive light without vision.

If a person is deaf and has no hearing, then how can we convince him that there is sound in nature? How can we prove the existence of sound?

No, we cannot. For one is unable to perceive sound without hearing.

If a person is ignorant and has no telegnosis, then how can we convince him that the Greatest Creator is in the universe? How can we prove the existence of the Greatest Creator?

We still cannot do that. For one is unable to perceive the Greatest Creator without telegnosis.

Telegnosis is an innate instinct. With telegnosis we can perceive the existence of the Greatest Creator.

Every one has telegnosis, but why we are unable to perceive the existence of the Greatest Creator?

This is because the telegnosis is blocked and blunted in the same way as one suffering from falling of eyesight cannot discern the view in front of his eyes.

If one鈥檚 eyesight has dropped, one pair of glasses will enable him or her to see clearly.

If one鈥檚 telegnosis is blunted, he will be able to perceive the existence of the Greatest Creator by improving his wisdom.

Someone wants to deny the existence of the Greatest Creator with a case of antinomy, 鈥淐an the Greatest Creator create a rock that he cannot lift?鈥

This question puts us in a dilemma. If we say 鈥淣o鈥, we have completely denied the Greatest Creator. If we say 鈥淵es鈥, it proves that the Greatest Creator cannot lift the rock he has created. The existence of the Greatest Creator is also negated by the statement that he cannot lift a rock. Whatever the answer is, the result is the negation of the Greatest Creator or at least the negation of the omnipotence of the Greatest Creator.

The man who creates this antinomy is very smart in that his minor question has perplexed the spiritual nature of many people, making them stay far away from the Greatest Creator and wisdom. This person is either Satan or someone disfavored by the Greatest Creator. He cannot taste the grapes, so he would try his best to prove that the grapes are sour and prevent others from eating the grapes.

鈥淐an the Greatest Creator create a rock that he cannot lift?鈥. This question is a trap. The similar question may be:

鈥淎re you a thing?鈥

How would you answer this question? No matter the answer is 鈥淵es鈥 or 鈥淣o鈥, you will fall into the trap of the designer. It does not make any difference whether to say 鈥淚 am not a thing鈥 or 鈥淚 am a thing鈥.

Thus, we cannot present positive or negative answers directly to any antinomies. Instead, we should consider from the question itself or lodge a rhetorical question. For example, the rhetorical question for 鈥淎re you a thing?鈥 is to aim the question 鈥淎re you a thing?鈥 directly at the person who asks this question. Let鈥檚 see how he will answer this question himself. The rhetorical question for 鈥淐an the Greatest Creator create a rock that he cannot lift?鈥 is 鈥淐an the Greatest Creator not lift a rock that he has created?鈥

The question 鈥淐an the Greatest Creator create a rock that he cannot lift鈥 is not tenable to the Greatest Creator himself. In the same way, the question 鈥淎re you a thing?鈥 is not tenable to the man himself. In addition, this question itself is a double negation. Namely, whatever the answer is, the question itself has secured the negation. Many philosophers and logicians have been puzzled by such questions. Here are some more paradoxes. Let鈥檚 see how you should answer.

鈥淎re you not an animal borne by your parents?鈥

鈥淐an eyes not see eyes?鈥

鈥淚s a man not a non-animal?鈥

Such questions cannot be answered directly but with the changes of some conditions.

The Greatest Creator related question can be answered: The Greatest Creator can create rocks under any condition. The Greatest Creator can lift rocks under any condition.

Any more questions?

The questions can be done in this way if we keep on. I will begin by asking 鈥淲hat is lifting? Does lifting mean holding the rock in both hands and raising it over the head?鈥 If the answer is no, what is lifting? If the answer is yes, suppose this rock is the earth and I stand upside down with both hands touching the earth, isn鈥檛 the earth over my head? You may reject the interpretation. For the earth is not over my head but under my head. Okay! What if I repeat the same action and move along the longitudes in 360 degrees, then should there be a point on the earth over my head? If not, which point of the universe is over us? And which point is under us? At this point, you may argue although I am holding the earth with both hands and although the earth is over my head, I am not holding the earth, rather it is the gravity from the earth that draws me. If this is the case, we should negate the meaning of lifting as we have first proposed. That is, holding the rock in both hands and raising it over the head cannot be regarded as lifting. Then what is lifting?

No matter how you define the meaning of 鈥渓ifting鈥, I can say I 鈥渓ift鈥 the earth as long as I change the direction. And if you say I 鈥渓ift鈥 the earth, I can prove that I am not lifting the earth. So, the question 鈥淐an the Greatest Creator create a rock that he cannot lift?鈥 is tenable or not?

We should pursue the Greatest Creator and get to know the Greatest Creator, otherwise we will not be able to understand the origin of the universe and the origin of life, or the past and future of human being. We cannot even understand the instincts of animals and the purpose of life.

I am 46 years old now. I have engaged in a wide variety of occupations: shepherd, peasant, migrant worker, secretary of Youth League branch, clerk, secretary of CPC branch, political instructor of art and cultural propaganda team of people鈥檚 commune, bench worker, electrician, automobile mechanic, middle school teacher, office clerk, office manager, interpreter, driver, salesman, grocery store manager, restaurant buyer, bartender, night club manager, manager of fast food department, property developer, and so on. The duration of my jobs all lasted for more than half a year with the exception of office manger and restaurant buyer, on which I stayed only for two months.

What have I gained from working on so many jobs?

What I have learned is, without a belief and an aim, life is just like the floating clouds drifting in the sky with wind. An inexplicit traffic accident I personally experienced several years ago has prompted me to explore the meaning of life. What on earth do I live for? For the sake of my country? Nonsense. I have problems even making a living for myself, how am I supposed to do anything for my country? Do I live for my parents? Absolutely not, otherwise, why should I survive after their death. For my wife? Unlikely. She may enjoy a better life without me being around. Do I live for my children? Not necessarily. How can those childless parents carry on life then? After the children grow up and have families of their own, what do I live for? I can no longer provide them with any help; on the contrary, I may prove troubles and burdens for them. Do I live for myself? How absurd it is! I can neither decide my birth nor my death. If there is an option, I would rather choose not to be borne and not to be a being at all. Then who brought me to this world? Is it because of the accidental union of my parents that I came into being? Definitely not! The universe is governed by laws. Everything has its causes and effects. Nothing exists purposelessly and accidently.

Everything exists for a particular purpose. Then what is the purpose of my existence? This obscure and confused way of living is beyond my endurance. I would rather die than to live without a clear understanding of myself and the world around. If I have no idea where I came from, then I should at least know where I am heading. Otherwise, it would be a great pity if someday I suddenly get killed in a traffic accident!

Can I live a life with understanding if I am wealthy? It seems that there is no single millionaire in the world who has solved the problem of the purpose of living. By the time you have a lot of money, perhaps you don鈥檛 have much energy and time left. You may have died before you know why you have lived. Besides, money does not come the way as you wish. Otherwise, anyone can be a billionaire.

Having power will make one understand the meanings of life? I doubt. There have been many emperors and kings appeared on the stage of human history. Did they really understand the purpose of life? Was there anyone of them left us with 鈥淏ook on Life鈥?

How about being a scientist? Great as Newton, Einstein, and Stephen Hawking are, they still wondered the origin of the universe, the origin of human being, and the origin of life. Would I be any better than them if I become a scientist? Moreover, just as I cannot become a singer because I am not born with the gift of a singer, I cannot be a scientist either. To be a scientist for me is something beyond my wildest dream.

Will it be possible for me to understand the meaning of life if I seek to become some kind of expert? I am afraid not. Let鈥檚 take archeologists and anthropologists for example. One day they would say that mankind originated from Europe, another day that mankind originated from Asia, still another day they would claim than mankind鈥檚 ancestor lived in Africa. To affirm the place of origin of mankind simply by a few pieces of fossils is far from reliable. It is likely to say that we would be originated from the Antarctica if some more human fossils are excavated from somewhere someday.

How about reading the Bible? Can it be a way to understand the meanings of life? Maybe I was born foolish. I have read the Bible for years, yet I have not been enlightened so far. Where is the Kingdom of the Greatest Creator? It has been there already or it will emerge in the future? Where would it be if it will emerge in the future? By future, do we mean a millennium, ten millennia, or a hundred million years? My life only spans scores of years. Is there such a thing as the resurrection of flesh and body? How can resurrection be realized? There is no doubt that Jesus is a god, the problem is whether there are any other gods that above Jesus? Why would Jesus undergo suffering if he is free from the control of other gods? Why almost all his disciples died an unnatural death? Is it possible for a god to lose control of his own fate? As a god, why couldn鈥檛 he protect even his own disciples? Why should they suffer for the blessing of other worldly life?

So I rely on Buddhism to guide me!

Buddhism preaches the previous life and the eternity, lifetime after lifetime, retributive justice, and karma. This makes sense. But how on earth does karma transform? How should a person behave to acquire eternity? Where is the Pure Land? And what does it look like? I have only read a few of the great many Buddhist sutras, so it is not for me to jump to a hasty conclusion. Since Buddhism has existed for more than two thousand years, it should be able to interpret the meaning of life, but it failed as well. If life is but a process of suffering, why does the Greatest Creator create so many wonderful things for people to enjoy? If the purpose of life is to attain Buddhahood, then what is Buddhahood? How can we attain Buddhahood? What is the probability of attaining Buddhahood? If only two to three out of the one thousand people who practice Buddhism succeed, then the rest would feel quite unwillingly to sacrifice the worldly pleasure.

Money, power and status, and scientists and other experts, Christianity and Buddhism 鈥揺ach may have its own arguments. But none of them can explain clearly the meaning of life. And for us mortals, we even have a hard time scraping up for daily existence, how can we have time to pore over the learning of sociology, natural science, and religion?

Is there a shortcut? Is it possible for us to seek the Greatest Creator directly, bypassing gods, Buddha and the knowledge accumulated by mankind, because only the Greatest Creator knows all and only the Greatest Creator has the ultimate power of decision?

Where can we find the Greatest Creator?

Read 鈥渨ordless鈥 book, read heaven, read world, read people, read things. Luckily I have undertaken more than twenty different jobs, and have experienced many hardships of life. In addition, after graduation from senior middle school I went further study for another three times. And I have stayed in the countryside, in small towns, and big cities. As a result, I can string up different phenomena and events for chain reflection. Nevertheless锛孖 am still confused.

So what could be the obstacle?

I was greatly enlightened when I incidentally browse the Koran, which says, 鈥淭he masses of deities and mankind, don鈥檛 hesitate to escape from domain of heaven and earth if you can. But it would not be possible for you to escape without the help of authority.鈥

Yes, how can I escape from the domain of heaven and earth without the power and help of authority (the Greatest Creator).

How can I get the support of the Greatest Creator?

By telegnosis, man is a part of the universe. Man can correspond with universe. The brain can immediately sense the sting on the toe. So if I send a 鈥渇ax of thought鈥 to the Greatest Creator, he will surely know my appeal.

Indeed, the picture of the birth of the universe, the origin of life, the origin of mankind, and the 36-dimension space began to appear in my mind. The subject of fate is thus revealed naturally.

Only at this time did I learn the Greatest Creator, Jesus, Sakyamuni, Lao Tzu, as well as mankind, universe, time, space, energy and matter, body and soul, the nature of life, and the meaning of life.

I came to know God by telegnosis which could only be sensed nor told. In order to facilitate the understanding and induce even greater enlightenment, I have cited 40 natural phenomena and 8 logical reasoning to prove the existence of the Greatest Creator and to illustrate the eight characteristics of the Greatest Creator and the eight major relations between the Greatest Creator and human being. Whether you can sense the existence of the Greatest Creator completely relies on your telegnosis and wisdom.

Last updated